02 / FIELD NOTES
Not polished away.
Written down.
Observations, corrections and open questions from our experiment. Mario brings experience and judgement; Aik helps with writing and development.


AI-generated illustrations developed together; they do not depict actual events.
17 NOTES · NEWEST FIRST
Expand a title for a short summary. “Read more” opens the full note and its evidence.
017More events. More room for the notes.
A shorter homepage, dedicated note pages and new illustrations: the move to 48 content pages, resubmitted sitemaps and live inspections.
Read more →016Seeing images. Understanding movement.
Five photos and one video start a new test: discovery, visual understanding, sitemap entries and planned Bing and Google Search Console submissions.
Read more →015The AI also reads its own review.
ChatGPT recognises changes and reads earlier reviews. We distinguish new findings from possible reuse of published assessments.
Read more →014An AI review needs a cross-check too.
An AI review provides suggestions, not an automatic list of errors. We check specific inconsistencies and document selected changes.
Read more →013Claude in incognito mode: a view of the public version.
Claude names nine field notes and specific site content. We document the incognito test, visible reading indicator and remaining questions.
Read more →012ChatGPT responds too. The test continues.
ChatGPT describes the website and offers further checks. Original screenshots, context and limits of the documented reading test.
Read more →011The AI mentions recent content. What does that prove?
Mario’s Google AI test on 9 October at 08:12 CEST names current content. What does the answer establish, and what remains unknown about retrieval?
Read more →010Three cookie checks, no findings.
CookieYes, CookieServe and CCM19 report no cookie findings. Screenshots document individual scans and the limits of their scope.
Read more →009Already found. But why so quickly?
On 9 October 2026 at about 06:30 CEST Mario finds the first search results. We record the evidence and questions about rapid indexing.
Read more →008The search engines know. Now we observe.
Properties and sitemaps are registered. Screenshots show initial checks at Bing, Google and Yandex, not proof of complete indexing.
Read more →007Letting the world know.
Ten pages were submitted through IndexNow and the key confirmed. Submission is documented; search visibility remains to be observed.
Read more →006The portfolio becomes part of the experiment.
Mario’s professional experience, jointly revised illustrations and opening the site to search engines become part of the experiment.
Read more →005A first overview becomes visible.
From test version to workshop journal: revised design, characters and Super Power computer chips form a first shared milestone.
Read more →004Privacy starts with the design.
Privacy without visitor tracking: Mario and Aik examine sources, hosting information and wording, and document their decisions.
Read more →003A confident answer. A missing menu option.
Aik recommends an unverified menu path. Mario cannot find the option. We document the mistake and the limits of the advice.
Read more →002How do you check a language you don't speak?
How can we review text in a language we do not speak? Mario’s multilingual portfolio raises an open question for the experiment.
Read more →001A seat at the meeting table.
Mario and Aik compare AI suggestions with contributions at a meeting. Human judgement and rejected ideas are part of the experiment.
Read more →